On 2015-09-06 23:58, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > yeah, I was thinking about this versatility. I guess "better" isn't a good > word. I was thinking "more powerful"
afaict, i would say it has a single feature that is trivial to implement for [FIR~] as well... and if the table data itself is static¹, then it should be pretty easy to get the desired behaviour with a wrapper abstraction around [FIR~] that copies the data with an offset into an internal proxy table. but well, if this is the only feature that makes [Buffir~] more powerful than [FIR~], i will tell thomas to add it. fgasdrm IOhannes ¹ that is: you don't continuously change the impulse response without telling the filter object _______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
