certainly you could call it "untrustworthy" though...cos there's no way of telling creation order from the GUI, and cut and paste or other re-patching is liable to open your patch to changes which would re-order things.
for all intents and purposes, you're best off thinking of it as totally random. On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Joe White <white.j...@gmail.com> wrote: > It might be a bit misleading to call this behaviour 'undefined'. > > As Alexandre points out, control execution is defined by the order the > connections appear in the netlist and so have reliable results each time > the patch is run. > > It's not really the same problem you have in other languages where there > is a runtime ambiguity. > > And is probably more an issue with the Pd environment UI than the language > specification. > > Cheers, > Joe > > On 7 September 2015 at 19:15, IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoel...@iem.at> wrote: > >> On 09/07/2015 08:01 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: >> > i hope this explains it. >> >> forgot this. >> >> gfmards >> IOhannes >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > >
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
