I would call this more of a feature than a bug that needs fixing. I would hope that [osc~] and [cos~] don't change, simply because many of us like these little nuances. If it is really bothersome then perhaps create a new version, but let’s not change a legacy object. A simple “fix” might break someone else’s patch.
Just my opinion, -Rob > Did you make it work in a patch? if so, can you share it? :) > > Maybe someone could work on a "fix" on the source and send it to miller, > perhaps this could be updated for the next version release (0.47). > > cheers > > 2015-11-22 19:32 GMT-02:00 Matt Barber <brbrof...@gmail.com > <mailto:brbrof...@gmail.com>>: > >> Yeah, so all that really needs to be done is to force symmetry by copying >> the 0-pi phase inverted to the pi-2pi phase + guard points for [tabosc4~]. >> I did that and it's been stable for 3.5 hours. It wouldn't be too hard to >> fix this in the Pd source; it would be a marked improvement to [osc~] even >> with the 512-pt table and linear interpolation.
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list