Sorry not to jump in before... I think in the case of this particular design flaw, the correct thing to do is to correct it but provide back compatibility (as I did earlier with hip~ and inlet~). It's quite possible nobody will ever care but it would be there in case someone did.
cheers Miller On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 04:25:49PM +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > On 2015-11-25 12:37, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > I fully support your opinion in this debate. If I'd be in charge, I'd > > fix it right away. > > +1 > > if you are doing glitch - and relying on a bug in a software to get > those nifty sounds *is* glitch -, then you shan't complain if bugs get > fixed¹. > > and of course: Pd is Open Source. > if you cannot live without any given bug, fork the source and unfix the > problem. > or just use an old version of Pd that still inhibits the problem. > > fgmasdr > IOhannes > > ¹ hey, why doesn't Pd crash any more? my entire performance relied on > that... > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
