Ah, if so it’d be nice to have that noted in the help patch ;) -------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/> > On Nov 21, 2015, at 4:00 AM, pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote: > > From: IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoel...@iem.at <mailto:zmoel...@iem.at>> > Date: November 20, 2015 at 10:15:53 AM MST > To: pd-list@lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at> > Subject: Re: [PD] [hdplay~] problem > > > On 11/20/2015 07:07 AM, Dan Wilcox wrote: >> Judging from the [readsf~] help patch, [readsf~] takes two optional >> arguments: >> >> 1. number of channels >> 2. buffer size per channel in bytes >> >> I think argument 2 might be worth investigating ... > > it is, but you might discover that it is about something else: > [readsf~] reads the data from harddisk in a separate thread. the "buffer > size" defines how much the reading thread can read ahead of the playback. > > gfmrdsa > IOhannes
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
