> I did share all features to be included according to my findings and research, of course
2016-02-20 21:34 GMT-02:00 Alexandre Torres Porres <por...@gmail.com>: > > > 2016-02-20 20:53 GMT-02:00 Jonathan Wilkes <jancs...@yahoo.com>: > >> One last question: >> Does Max/MSP retain all the same class interfaces for version 4/5 classes >> in later versions of Max/MSP? For example, is Max 7 guaranteed to be >> backwards compatible with all the internal classes of Max 4.5? >> > > Lets go as low as 4.6, version from the time of cyclone's release. > > I, for one, haven't found any backwards compatibility issue yet. All I see > is objects respecting backwards compatibility and including a few new > features. > > Examples: - maximum buffer allowed in buffir~ is now 4096 samples instead > of 256. > > - [wave~] first offered no interpolation (0) or linear interpolation (1), > now offers 4 other interpolation methods (2-6) > > I did search around, I haven't mapped all changes possible one by one, I > focused on important objects and found a few things, not much. I mean to > say it's probably not too crazy like them updating every object at every > new release. Most are still the same in Max 7 as they were in 4.6! I did > share all features to be included so objects could be updated, the number > it's like new features for 4 or 5 objects... > > Now, when implementing new objects that were present in 4.6, one has no > good reason to go back to version 4.6 instead of checking Max 7 to clone > the new version without even bothering if it is different than before... > > Don't know how many of the objects I suggested are also Max6+, pong might > be the very only one... > > cheers > >
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list