2016-03-28 17:35 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list <pd-list@lists.iem.at >:
> after skimming it I don't see any sensible way to achieve what you want. > Just to be clear, do you mean you can't see any way, or that you may see some possible hacks that might be very clumsy and might not work well and be kind of non sensible tasks? > it's not like the method space is the only discrepancy. In fact, the object already sets this method via a message in the first inlet, and this was working already in the last release, although the documentation was wrong, saying it had a "buffsize" method, when it is actually "bufsize". At first I thought the object was bugged, but the documentation was. So we already have that implemented and it is fine. We've been working on it for a great deal now, and the only discrepancy left is this feature. It'd be good to make it 100% compatible, and it is really convenient to use this feature by the way - as we always have to tweak with this parameter when using scope~ cheers
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
