yes i see you are right. see attached. maybe just a help file update for clarity....
m On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Claude Heiland-Allen <cla...@mathr.co.uk> wrote: > On 03/05/16 19:30, me.grimm wrote: > >> for example [makefilename %s%%s%%%s] the %%%s is >> replaced with 0000000 >> > > I'm guessing %%%s is parsed as %% %s, and that you really need %%%%s to > get %% %% s which becomes % % s (aka %% s) which finally becomes %s? > > See also: https://www.xkcd.com/1638/ > > > Claude > -- > https://mathr.co.uk > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > -- ____________________ m.e.grimm, m.f.a, ed.m. syracuse u., tc3 megrimm.net ____________________
makefilename-n-tuple-test-02.pd
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
