Waiting for September 19th :) 2016-08-22 1:16 GMT-03:00 Jaime <jaime.oliv...@gmail.com>:
> Hi all, > > Anonymity is desirable but clearly not always feasible. No one will be > disqualified for not being anonymous. > Just do the best you can to follow the guidelines! > > Best, > > J > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Aug 21, 2016, at 6:03 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres <por...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > 2016-08-16 19:06 GMT-03:00 Jaime Oliver <jaime.oliv...@gmail.com>: > >> Dear Warren, >> >> The idea is that the pdf document itself is anonymous, as there clearly >> is some data that asks for biographic information. >> It is also clear that in some cases it will be inevitable or at least not >> ideal to make the application anonymous and in these cases we will ask >> reviewers to be impartial. >> > > So, the paper proposal I'm about to send with collaborators is mostly > anonymous, but it refers to a github link where my secret idendity (and > theirs) is revealed. I think the repository is a relevant reference to the > work to be proposed, and that even if I hide it, some people closely > related to the community will still know about who's involved... anyway, if > you feel it should be hidden, I could do it, let me know. > > Now, about the artistic proposals, are they supposed to be anonymous too? > I can see the anonymous issue being important for paper reviewing, if you > want the event to be more academic, but I don't think I've ever seen an > event where you need to hide who you are, and sometimes that's not > possible... so I'm just checking if this is really it. > > thanks > >
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list