> in case purr-data turns out to be reliable, would it be a possible idea to > use it also > with this project, or is it too much too fast?
> I have no plans to switch from libpd which is built around Pd vanilla. AFAICT > most of the major updates to versions/branches/forks etc of Pure Data involve > usability and bundling of externals which is a different domain that is not > useful > for a libpd-based app which creates it’s own interface and only uses the pd > core. There are many improvements to the core. Off the top of my head: * $@ (mentioned in the OP of this thread)* preset_hub/preset_node* [trigger bang 0] (constant args in trigger) * introspection objects: [pdinfo] [canvasinfo] [objectinfo] [classinfo]* matju's one-liner that adds a "clear" method for [delwrite~]* the continually-requested $0 inside message boxes* I think Ivica added [list cat]... -Jonathan
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
