Sorry, I meant we only needed to #include "m_pd.h" as usual. On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 3:46 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoel...@iem.at> wrote:
> On 2016-10-04 04:44, Matt Barber wrote: > > I don't think we need a copy of it. We just need to include an existing > > one, preferably from current vanilla. > > how do you include without copying? > what is "current"? Pd-0.47-1? Pd-0.48-3? > > please do not include verbatim copies of *any* Pd-headers in your > project. this is just bound to break sooner or later, making it even > harder to fix. > the Pd headers really must match the Pd binary running on the system > where you compile. since the Pd binary is upgraded outside of your > project, so should the headers. > > also, on w32 you need the corresponding pd.lib/pd.dll to properly link. > (and if you decide to ship that as well, you could just ship the entire > Pd; or just ship properly compiled binaries of your external). > > fgmasdr > IOhannes > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/ > listinfo/pd-list > >
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list