Thanks, works perfectly! David.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Christof Ressi <christof.re...@gmx.at> wrote: > [loadbang] doesn't fire in dynamically created patches. > The easiest workaround: use [iemguts/initbang]. > > Christof > > > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. Februar 2017 um 17:18 Uhr > Von: David <dfket...@gmail.com> > An: Pd-List <pd-list@lists.iem.at> > Betreff: [PD] Question about loadbang and dynamic sub-patches > > Hi! > > I have a question about the expected behaviour of loadbang when it's used > in a sub-patch that's built dynamically. It appears that it isn't getting > triggered. I've attached a simplified example. > > Should it get triggered? Does anyone know of a workaround for this? In > other words, something that's functionally equivalent? I want certain > events to happen once when I build a sub-patch dynamically, to initialize > some objects. I guess I could use creation arguments to do that, but I'd > rather not have to do that. > > Thanks, > David. > _______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at > mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
