Well, the change fixes a very annoying bug... perhaps I can fix it so that there's an extra version argument to the message (version 0, teh default, would be the old behavior; version 1 would be the new)
cheers Miller On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:17:44AM +0200, oliver wrote: > Christof Ressi wrote: > >yeah, changing the 2 to 3 always works but the remaining problem is: > >what about all those patches which have a '2' in the > >[donecanvasdialog( message? I know, dynamic patching is not > >'officially' supported but it's a very common practice with whole > >libraries relying on it. > > > > yes, i can also confirm, that all my (resizable) GOP abstractions are broken > due to this new behaviour. (changing all patches from 2 to 3 would work > though, and yes it would be "backwards-compatible") > > i really like to confirm christofs request to change this back to old > behaviour. sharing patches or studying patches from archives will be a pain > if they used the donecanvasdialog method. > > best > > oliver > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list