yeah, but I obviously didn't want to do that :) 2017-10-14 20:10 GMT-03:00 Christof Ressi <christof.re...@gmx.at>:
> you could also just pass the upsampling rate as a creation argument or > message :-) > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 15. Oktober 2017 um 00:29 Uhr > Von: "Alexandre Torres Porres" <por...@gmail.com> > An: "Christof Ressi" <christof.re...@gmx.at> > Cc: "pd-list@lists.iem.at" <pd-list@lists.iem.at> > Betreff: Re: Re: [PD] how to get the actual sample rate? > > more precisely: a brickwall filter (8th order lowpass butterworth) whose > cutoff is at 0.9 * Nyquist, so you can do upsampling + filter for > anti-aliasing. > > 2017-10-14 19:19 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Torres Porres <por...@gmail.com > [mailto:por...@gmail.com]>: > > 2017-10-14 18:27 GMT-03:00 Christof Ressi <christof.re...@gmx.at[mailto: > christof.re...@gmx.at]>:just curious: why/where do you need it? > > for an abstraction > > but now I also have an external I did so I can use in this abstraction >
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
