I've been thinking about some sort of such extention of loadbang - also to allow you to specify the message, as in "loadbang 5" - I think that would get a lot of use. But I don't have a solid sense of what the design should be (and am always afraid of implementing something before I understand all the issues; if I do something stupid then its there forever :)
Miller On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 08:44:25PM +0200, Dan Wilcox wrote: > Or [loadbang] could have a second outlet for init bangs... > > > On Oct 22, 2017, at 7:35 PM, pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote: > > > > I can think of an easier solution that doesn't even require another Pd > > object: [loadbang] could take a non zero argument to turn it into > > [initbang]. That'd be so easy to implement that even I could do it... (it's > > just action = LB_INIT instead of LB_LOAD). This would also be backwards > > compatible, of course. I could even go ahead and make a PR for that. > > -------- > Dan Wilcox > @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika> > danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/> > robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list