here... https://mathr.co.uk/blog/2015-04-21_approximating_cosine.html
with an update here... https://mathr.co.uk/blog/2016-07-20_approximating_cosine_update.html cheers Miller On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 11:15:54PM -0500, Matt Barber wrote: > I'd be interested to look at Claude Heiland's implementation in any case. > To be clear, it sounds like you're talking about the oscillator performance > and not just building the table? > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Miller Puckette <m...@ucsd.edu> wrote: > > > Claude Heiland has a much better cosine implementation that's faster and > > more accurate - but I need to do some profiling to see how to compile it > > so that it gets the speeds he gets. Someone else could look at it I guess > > but I'll certainly have to spend some time with it myself too. So it's for > > 0.49. > > > > cheers > > Miller > > > > On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 04:54:02PM -0200, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > > > 2017-12-05 1:12 GMT-02:00 Miller Puckette <m...@ucsd.edu>: > > > > > > > That one needs a lot more work... > > > > > > > > > > I see... anything we could try and do it for you? Or would you rather > > > tackle it yourself for 0.49 or something? > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/ > > listinfo/pd-list > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/ > > listinfo/pd-list > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
