Yep... the make step is decently fast. But I almost never just remake without for some reason having to reconfigure. This is probably because of my own file-hygeine habits which date from the 80s, so not relevant to anyone else.
cheers Miller On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 10:55:46PM +0100, Dan Wilcox wrote: > > > On Jan 9, 2018, at 6:17 PM, pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote: > > > > Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 09:17:49 -0800 > > From: Miller Puckette <m...@ucsd.edu <mailto:m...@ucsd.edu>> > > To: IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoel...@iem.at <mailto:zmoel...@iem.at>> > > Cc: pd-list@lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at> > > Subject: Re: [PD] pd-0.48.1 trouble getting started > > Message-ID: <20180109171749.GB32197@elroy.localdomain > > <mailto:20180109171749.GB32197@elroy.localdomain>> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > > > Yes, FYI I'm still using makefile.gnu. It takes about 25% as long to do the > > job as the automake thing does, and when it fails I can usually figure out > > why. > > The configure step is slow but the actual make part is usually not much > slower than a plain makefile since automate generates plain makefiles. > However, the configure step gives you easily configurable build options, > system checks, library checks, and a helpful configuration output print at > the end. > > -------- > Dan Wilcox > @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika> > danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/> > robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list