Ok, so it is a combination of editing the canvas and pointer memory i don’t think it has to do with saving. also, i don’t think it would relate to the previous pix_data pointer issue
Here’s a patch
stale-pointer.pd
Description: Binary data
On Feb 28, 2018, at 11:24 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoel...@iem.at> wrote: > On 02/28/2018 10:53 AM, Fede Camara Halac wrote: >> Would saving (cmd+s) make pix_data forget a pointer, as in [text] or [array] >> objects when using pointers? > > that sounds very fishy to. > do you have a patch that exposes the forget-on-save behaviour of [array] > or [text]? > > gfmdasr > IOhannes > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
