Derek Kwan <derek.x.k...@gmail.com> writes: > oliver <oli...@klingt.org> writes: > >> even if "uniform rendering across systems" is definitely a worthy goal, >> are the bigger inlets really unavoidable ? >> >> no chance to at least hack a personal version of a tcl file to make >> them thin again ? >> >> i for one like the slimmer inlets waaaaay better. > > I suppose I'm in the minority in the proceedings of this > thread,... but I actually like the thick inlets/outlets =) I've never > had the best eyesight (as evidenced by my ever-growing thickness of > glasses lenses over my lifetime) so I like things big and > high-contrasty (if anything, I could use another pixel-width thickness =P). > > I suppose to due my differing opinion, I would +1 the option to change > inlet/outlet thicknesses, perhaps via TCL or .pdsettings. > > Derek
Sorry for the double posting in quick succession, but I've just noticed that although these objects have the thicker inlets/outlets: objects number boxes symbol boxes message boxes The following have the original THINNER inlets/outlets (perhaps due to them being more "fullblown GUI elements") : number2 boxes radios sliders bangs toggles VU meters To sum up, everything in the first subdivision of the "Put" menu (besides comments which don't have inlets/outlets) have the thicker inlets/outlets, everything in the second subdivision has the smaller ones. Which is a bit inconsistent. Personally, I have a really hard time seeing those inlets/outlets in that second list, but from this thread, there are differing opinions to be had on the subject. Derek -- Derek Kwan www.derekxkwan.com _______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
