On 03/31/2018 05:10 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > 2018-03-31 12:04 GMT-03:00 mario buoninfante <mario.buoninfa...@gmail.com>: > >> Hi Roman, >> >> you're absolutely right, in fact that's the way I'm doing. but I suppose >> that having the possibility to directly set the object would allow to have >> better performances. >> > > sure +1 >
saying "better performance" is somewhat a no-brainer, but do you have any estimate on *how much* better that performance would be? e.g. Pd can easily process enough midi-messages to make pianos talk¹ on a rpi2-like arm processor. would the extra CPU power you get by the performance boost of a ctlin inlet allow you to make money with hashcoins? or to quote knuth: "premature optimization is the root..." fmsdr IOhannes PS: there probably isn't any good reason to not have additional inlets for [ctlin]. but performance is in an entirely different realm. ¹ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muCPjK4nGY4
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
