On Mon, 2018-04-02 at 05:01 -0700, Derek Kwan wrote: > > For me, I can't count how many times I had to add a [$0], or a pack > > or > > some extra workaround before a message so that I could send > > messages > > to my variables (I hardly use variables without a $0). > > > > Joao > I do face this too where I use $0 with all my [v]s and [s]s and [r]s > and > it does get to be a bit tedious BUT I'm not quite sure if mixing the > two > worlds and their rules are worth it...
Yeah! Ideally, there would be two different prefixes for message expansion and creation argument expansion. THEN you could have it convenient, #0 would expand to the message selector, $0 to the implicit ID, $1 to the first creation argument, #1 to the first atom of the incoming message, etc... And everyone would be happy. I just see no way to go from here to there... Roman
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
