Hi Mario, you're right, [del], [pipe] (and [metro] btw) themselves are unproblematic because clocks are timestamped (and therefore [timer] will show the correct logical time). the problem really lies in the conversion from/to audio, as you noted correctly.
for the sake of completeness: with every scheduler tick, Pd checks for clock timeouts, polls the GUI and does 64 samples of DSP computation. now let's say a canvas has [block~ 256]: in the first 3 schedular ticks nothing happens expect for [inlet~] buffering, only at the 4th tick we actually do the 256 samples of DSP. but this means that clock timeouts can only happen before those 256 samples - not in between! still, clock timeouts happen at the same "rate" as DSP computation. now imagine this canvas has a subcanvas with [block~ 64]: everytime the parent canvas (256 samples) is processed, the subcanvas (64 samples) gets processed 4 times in a row and clock timeouts effectively only happen every 4 blocks. but this means DSP computation and clock timeouts are out of sync and even sub-sample correct objects like [vline~] might behave strangely. eventually, the number of samples between clock timeouts for a canvas and all its subcanvasses is determined by the largest blocksize within the list of parent canvasses. [block~ 1] on a root canvas is just the simple case where the parent blocksize equals the schedular tick size of 64 samples. Christof > Gesendet: Samstag, 28. Juli 2018 um 11:50 Uhr > Von: "mario buoninfante" <mario.buoninfa...@gmail.com> > An: "Christof Ressi" <christof.re...@gmx.at> > Cc: Pd-List <pd-list@lists.iem.at> > Betreff: Re: Aw: [PD] triggering [print~] faster than every 64 samples > > Hi Christof, > > > thanks for that, this clarifies quite a lot of things. that said it > seems that objects like [del] and [pipe] can deal with this kind of > situations (ie [del 1 10 samp]). the "issue" seems to appear when you > start using "hybrid" objects (control signal to audio signal or the > other way around). am I right assuming that? > > > cheers, > > Mario > > > On 28/07/18 10:43, Christof Ressi wrote: > > the technical reason is that clock timeouts can't happen in intervals > > smaller than 64 samples (pd's scheduler blocksize) *), so any objects > > relying on clocks (e.g. [print~], [bang~], [line~], [vline~], [del], > > [pipe], etc) might not work as expected. > > > > Christof > > > > *) more generally, clock timeouts are limited to the largest parent > > blocksize. see attached patch. > > > >> Gesendet: Samstag, 28. Juli 2018 um 10:45 Uhr > >> Von: "mario buoninfante" <mario.buoninfa...@gmail.com> > >> An: Pd-List <pd-list@lists.iem.at> > >> Betreff: [PD] triggering [print~] faster than every 64 samples > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm trying to trigger [print~] every sample. in the same patch I'm using > >> [block~ 1 1 1] to change the block size and [metro 1 1 samp] to trigger > >> [print~]. > >> > >> but I noticed that [print~] is yes printing 1 sample at time (in accord > >> with the block size) but only every 64 samples. so it receives a bang > >> every sample but prints every 64 (default block size). > >> > >> can you guys help me understanding why? I'm pretty sure I'm missing > >> something here :D > >> > >> > >> cheers, > >> > >> Mario > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > >> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > _______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list