*and I appreciate your *explanation* 2018-08-07 18:29 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Torres Porres <por...@gmail.com>:
> Thanks for the detailed/long answer, it's clearer now how things should > work. Sorry for being confused, it's true I recently fell by accident into > the software development world and I appreciate your , but in my defense > and untrained view, this distinction wasn't clear, as [noise~] just had an > addition, and I've also seen additions in -x versions (bob~ for instance). > It also felt to me that increasing the limits of [soundfiler] was an > update, not a fix. > > But I get it now this wasn't probably good for 0.48-2... > > cheers > > > 2018-08-07 11:28 GMT-03:00 Dan Wilcox <danomat...@gmail.com>: > >> >> On Aug 7, 2018, at 4:26 PM, Dan Wilcox <danomat...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> And while we're on the soundfiler subject, sorry to >> bring/suggest another request, but this >> <https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/193> would also be a nice >> update to it. >> >> >> In short: No. That's an addition, so best left to the next minor version. >> >> >> Then again, it's not up to me. :) But that's the general reasoning as to >> why only smaller fixes are being integrated for 0.48-2 so far. >> >> -------- >> Dan Wilcox >> @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika> >> danomatika.com >> robotcowboy.com >> >> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list