Totally agree with Dan on all points. On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 at 12:32, Dan Wilcox <danomat...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My 2 cents: > > * "subpatch" to me refers to [pd ...] aka a patch within a patch, saved > within the same patch file that uses it (no object instantiation) > > * "abstraction" to me refers to a patch saved to and loaded from it's own > file (object instantiation) > > * using "subpatches and abstractions" when referring to both is the is the > best option, I agree that "subwindow" is problematic since there multiple > types of things displayed in multiple windows already (ie. the audio dialog > could conceptually be a subwindow as well...) > > * my preference is for "subpatch" as opposed to "sub-patch" > > * "canvas" is problematic as there are already two notions of canvas > within Pd: the Pd patch canvas and the TK drawing canvas > > On Aug 12, 2018, at 11:40 PM, pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote: > > Message-ID: <40aca4a4-d098-f49b-4914-46180e74d...@revolwear.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > I see, then maybe we are better off without umbrella term and just refer > to subpatches and abstractions as "subpatches and abstractions". > > m. > > > -------- > Dan Wilcox > @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika> > danomatika.com > robotcowboy.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list