" > > that is not to say, that opensource devs should not be paid, just that > some may not want to accept any money. >
they should be free not to, and give it to someone else, put it in a fund for other bounties or the next Pd con, ..." Nice. On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 09:59, João Pais <jmmmp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > part of the freedom of opensource developement is for many, that they can >> focus on what they are interested in. >> and there are no obligations. >> if money is involved that becomes more complex quite fast. >> > > no one should be forced to do anything. If someone doesn't want to take a > task, then just say no - of course, but if someone takes on a task and then > changes its mind, that's a more complex situation; in the limit it could > take on only part of the bounty for the part of the work done, or not at > all. > > > >> that is not to say, that opensource devs should not be paid, just that >> some may not want to accept any money. >> > > they should be free not to, and give it to someone else, put it in a fund > for other bounties or the next Pd con, ... > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list