Thanks! [pd~] is news to me. Will research...
Cheers (Sorry for not trimming) On Sun, Jan 5, 2020, 10:18 AM Christof Ressi <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > have you tried splitting the workload across several cores, e.g. with > [pd~]? This worked quite well for me. > > If this isn't possible or not enough, then rewriting parts of your patch > as externals can definitely give a significant performance boost. > > Christof > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 05. Januar 2020 um 18:54 Uhr > Von: "Andrew Lyons" <[email protected]> > An: pd-list <[email protected]> > Betreff: [PD] How to make a large patch performant > > Hi, > > > My pure data patch has grown beyond the processing power of my Raspberry > pi. I am looking at software options to make it performant again: > > 1./ Heavy compiler > 2./ Convert abstractions to extensions. > > Recommendations? Suggestions? > > Thanks >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
