thanks for confirming, johannes! for now i settled for breaking up the numbers in chunks of 6 digits without using makefilename. but i agree: > on the long run, we should just improve the way numbers are written to disk.
best hans > Am 24.09.2020 um 13:53 schrieb IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoel...@iem.at>: > > On 2020-09-24 10:40, hans w. koch wrote: >> has this changed somehow since or should it still be avoided? > > nothing changed. > >> or is there a way to “flush” the symboltable at runtime? > > no. > > [makefilename] is definitely the wrong tool to solve the problem > (although it's probably the one that is available right now, in Pd-vanilla). > > on the long run, we should just improve the way numbers are written to disk. > > gfadsrm > IOhannes > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
