On Wed, 2020-12-23 at 15:10 +0100, Gilles Marivier wrote: > Le 23/12/2020 à 14:53, Roman Haefeli a écrit : > > On Tue, 2020-12-22 at 16:59 +0100, Gilles Marivier wrote: > > > > > I encounter a problem regarding Pduino 0.6 with Pd vanilla 0.51-1 > > > > > > > On Wed, 2020-12-23 at 11:33 +0100, Gilles Marivier wrote: > > > > > route 13 0 20 1 (message->prepend) connection failed > > > route 14 0 20 1 (message->prepend) connection failed > > > route 16 0 20 1 (bang->prepend) connection failed > > > route 17 0 20 1 (bang->prepend) connection failed > > > > What you tell us is a contradiction. Pduino 0.6 doesn't use any > > object > > [prepend]. Either you are using not Pduino 0.6 or your reports are > > from > > different tests. Anyway, it's important to mention such errors as > > above. Those are critical and as IOhannes said the object is very > > unlikely to work without addressing those errors. > > > > Roman > > This was an answer to the question "and have you tried pduino 0.5 > with Pd-vanilla 0.51-1? " IOhannes asked.
I see. I'm not so interested in fixing 0.5, since the goal of creating 0.6 was exactly to get rid of many externals and making installing Pduino a bit easier. Do you see any messages in the Pd console when loading [pduino] from the 0.6 release? > I rechanged the subject to stick with IOhannes' and your suggestions. > Is it ok now ? Looks good. Roman
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
