On Mon, 2021-01-18 at 12:43 +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > > afaik, the only thing that does not work¹ are emojis. while they are > technically just unicode symbols, it seems that i cannot enter them > (although they are displayed correctly, if you get them into the > patch
Saying "the only thing that does not work" implies everything else works. I'm not sure what you exactly mean by that. Are you saying that utf-8-support is fully implemented, but Pd's font doesn't contain all symbols? Or do you even mean all utf-8 can be displayed in Pd (except emojis)? On a minimal Debian Buster where I basically only installed Pd 0.51.3 from backports, I cannot display many symbols in Pd, although the same symbols are displayed correctly in the terminal. See attached screenshot with a clef example. I don't have a problem with Pd's utf-8 support per se, but according to your statement I wonder what is expected and what is a bug. Roman
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
