On Fri, 2021-06-04 at 21:34 +0200, Dan Wilcox wrote: > Ah yes, you are right. [timeout( is for TCP. I think I got that mixed > up with UDP previously closing itself after some sort of unknown host > return etc which we removed to make it "fire and forget."
Ah, now I remember. It was that thread where I read about those notification messages. Your message reminded me that I was actually testing with [iemnet/udpclient] which does not seem to ignore those messages. And indeed, [netsend -u] does _not_ disconnect itself when sending many packets to Miller's proposed UDP server emulation. However, many packets are dropped, even on localhost. So, it seems that the quickly-binding-and-releasing-port business doesn't really make for a decent UDP server, unfortunately. I was hoping that a C illiterate person like me would get something going with Pd performing better than with Python. I guess I have to wait for https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues/949 or learn C ;-) Roman
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
