Hello,
Antoine finality found the bug in my code that prevent the windows compilation.

So shmem 1.1 is finally out!

Thanks to Antoine wizardry and some magic in github, a package was 
automatically upload to deken with binary for everybody!

let's wait the standard time for deken to share it and test!!!

cheers
C

Le 17/03/2022 à 18:04, Charles Z Henry a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 3:26 AM IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoel...@iem.at> wrote:


On 3/17/22 08:58, cyrille henry wrote:

Notable limitations:
1. Every process needs to know/use the same size for shmem ID's.
is that a real limitation?
Do you have a practicable example where one need to share memory of
different size?

i don't think this is the problem that chuck is referring to.
afaiu, it's rather that the two processes need to have a priori
knowledge of two different "thingies" in order to share some memory
(without bad surprises): the ID and the size.

from a UX pov the question is, why it's not possible to only have to
share a single "thingy" (the ID) and have the others be shared implicitly.

fmgdsaf
IOhannes

Yes, it's exactly that--there's always at least one shared piece of
information that's hard-coded in both patches, if you want to
communicate solely through shmem.  It's trivially extended though.
All processes agree to read from one chosen shmem ID of size 2 on
startup and know that it contains the ID/size of a variable-length
shmem that's now known.  Before you know it, you're writing a whole
protocol.

What's the best method for callbacks from a process that has completed
its task and has data ready to be staged out?
The toplevel process has to be able to be reached from multiple
processes--so that seems like it should just be a udp port.  Unsure on
this point, though

Best,
Chuck



_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list



_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to