Ah, yes. Cyclone is a bit special.
At least with the CMake build system you can configure with
"-DBUILD_SINGLE_LIBRARY=ON" and that will build Cyclone as a single
binary. I can't see anything equivalent in the pd-lib-builder build
system, though. You could open a feature request:
https://github.com/porres/pd-cyclone
Christof
On 26.03.2022 01:40, Philip Stone via Pd-list wrote:
Thanks again, Christof. Trying that, I’m getting this result:
➜ pd-cyclone-master make make-lib-executable=yes arch="arm64 x86_64"
++++ info: using Makefile.pdlibbuilder version 0.6.0
++++ info: using Pd API
/Applications/Pd-0.52-1-arm64.app/Contents/Resources/src/m_pd.h
++++ info: making target all in lib cyclone
pd-lib-builder/Makefile.pdlibbuilder:815: *** Can not build library
blob because lib.setup.sources is undefined. Stop.
I’ve searched for any mention of ‘lib.setup.sources’ and come up
empty. Can anybody tell me how to set that correctly?
Thanks for your patience, all!
Phil Stone
UC Davis
P.S. My system is up and running on an M1 MacBook, and it is, by my
very rough estimate, around 3X faster than my system running on x86-64
Pd. That is, setups which ate nearly all the processor available for
audio, now don’t go above 33%. I’m **very** happy, and thinking up
ways to use up this bandwidth bonanza.
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 01:17:02 +0100
From: Christof Ressi <i...@christofressi.com
<mailto:i...@christofressi.com>>
To:pd-list@lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at>
Subject: Re: [PD] (no subject)
Message-ID: <98e3752a-6ac1-2a05-abe1-c79375703...@christofressi.com
<mailto:98e3752a-6ac1-2a05-abe1-c79375703...@christofressi.com>>
> Is there a way, using pd-lib-builder, to build the ?unified? library
> for Cyclone?
Do you mean building everything as a single binary (instead of separate
binaries per object)? This can be done with:
$ make make-lib-executable=yes
Christof
> I?m currently working well enough for my own needs, but I?d like to
> supply a deployable library for Deken for cyclone-darwin (including
> arm64), and am not sure how to do that.
>
> Best,
>
> Phil Stone
>
> UC Davis
>
> IOhannes wrote:
>
> >On 3/24/22 15:44, Philip Stone via Pd-list wrote:
>
> >>/Thank you for the pointers. Running ?make? on its own does indeed
> build cyclone, and since I?m doing it on an M1 macbook, it generates
> arm64 executables, and ?install? puts them in ~/lib/cyclone. (? - Is
> that right?), and they actually work!/
>
> >>//
>
> >>/However, I was hoping to generate fat, single-library binaries for
> Deken, and I thought CMake might make that easier. >> I will look into
> the necessary flags for doing it with ?make?./
>
> //
>
> >```
>
> >make arch="arm64 x86_64 i386 ppc"
>
> >```
>
> >leave out the architectures you do not want or know (and those that the
>
> >compiler is not able to produce, which most likely includes all but the
>
> >first two)
>
> >mdfgasd
>
> >IOhannes
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management
->https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
