Another side note: it would be nice if a negative field count for [text get] would output all fields up to the next seperator (comma or semi).I agree and it does so already.
I don't think so: 1 2 3 a b c d e f; [0 3 -1( -> [text get] gives me: "text get: bad field count (-1)"
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
