This is 'correct' behavior, although perhaps not intuitive - sub-patches
are considered atomic within their parents. (I believe this is
different from the way Max manages things).
cheers
Miller
On 11/16/23 11:32, Clemens wrote:
Hello there,
I noticed that pd handles delayed feedback loops a little bit odd.
Feedback loops seem to be only allowed within the sub patch that
contains the delay as well. When I patch the feedback loop in the
parent of the patch that contains the delay, pd complains with the
usual error message and doesn't give me audio output.
The screenshots below illustrate the issue.
No problem in this case. Everything fine.
I would argue this patch is functionally equivalent to the one above,
but it refuses to run.
Is this behavior intended?
Best wishes,
Clemens Wegener
--
—
|\
| \
C | H\
/ \ |
/ \|
|\ A /|
| \ / |
| | |
I | R
|
The Center for
Haptic Audio Interaction Research
http://www.chair.audio
https://twitter.com/ChairAudio
https://www.facebook.com/chair.audio
+49 3643 583940
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list__;!!Mih3wA!FkWRblYhsgnkWpO53JyeaxPm2CdAzYXPJ06apXJeo-V3qpKddOyls4bN8rGq0vAOXz4vfLRCDSrXzdY$
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
