[this time form the correct address...] On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 03:15:39PM +0100, Sascha Pollok wrote: > Hi Job, et al, > > Let's please keep it required. Many people rely on PDB information to > automate peering configurations. It does not happen often that we need to > configure peering sessions that require manual input and when it happens, > it is actually annoying. Making IP addresses optional will make more ASes > not document them either of lazyness or weird security reasons. If someone > thinks not disclosing them gives extra security they do have a problem > anyway. It's easy to find out peering LAN IPs if someone wants to do > something ugly. > > Please keep them required.
Yes. If the [not uncommon] case of signaling intent-to-be-there is needed, that should be simply a separate flag not an overloading of the address field. Cheers! Joe -- Posted from my personal account - see X-Disclaimer header. Joe Provo / Gweep / Earthling _______________________________________________ Pdb-tech mailing list [email protected] http://lists.peeringdb.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdb-tech
