> Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 17:24:25 +0100 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Hey, I was wondering when are we going to change symbol names to > > fit the specs we defined. > > > > Function names are implicated too, right ? > > > > Thus, "pdf_alloc()" would be "pdf_b_alloc ()". > > > > I think that it is better to not put an explicit layer mark in symbol > > names. > > > > I'm confused, I thought that was the idea :-/ > > I considered that it would be too burdensome to put the layer > identification in each symbol defined by the library. I also believe > that to have a unique namespace (i.e. pdf_) will also lead to a better > design by improving the global coherence of the abstractions > implemented in the several layers. >
I see, I didn't know what the conclusions were. -gerel
