> Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 04:15:10 +0200 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > I am also adapting the existing codebase to follow that conventions > > (particularly the names for the functions that instantiate ADTs: > > pdf_FOO_new). > > Great!! > > BTW regarding pdf_FOO_new, > ## > pdf_status_t pdf_FOO_new (args..., pdf_FOO_t *adt) > ### > > I guess it's more common to pass the ADT type first and then the > args anyway. > > Hmm, my brain seems to like left-to-right flows... > > ...but only in technical issues! > ...I hope! > > Damn! This is getting really scary! ;D
Indeed. But I won't blame you. :-P It was just a suggestion anyway. -gerel
