> Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:27:43 +0100 > From: [email protected] > > > Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:48:24 +0100 > > From: [email protected] > > > > Gerel, what do you think about this? We would of course loose the > > benefits of the opaque pointers in this case, but 'pdf_obj_equal_p' > > throwing PDF_ENOMEM sounds quite weird, and I think that we could make > an > > exception and publish the iterator structure. > > > > BTW An alternative would be to allocate an iterator along with the > list, and still have the structures hidden from the public. What > you think ? > > Hm, a pre-allocated iterator... but then we would need to update the > module interface to allow the client to get a reference to it, right? >
Jemarch, I'm confused now :-), let's restate the issue or let it die. -gerel
