On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:25 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > The ghostscript people went ahead to write a new lightweight PDF > interpreter called GhostPDF, independent from ghostscript. It seems > (it is somewhat obscure) that Mupdf+Fitz is a proof of concept of that > effort. I don't know if mupdf+fitz is still considered as a prototype > nor the plans artifex may have for it.
"GhostPDF" is mostly a marketing term at this point. It's not useful for distinguishing code bases. We're not sure what we're going to do. We're well aware of maintenance burden of having the PDF interpreter in PostScript. We may port mudpdf to the gs graphics library, or maybe just spruce up mupdf+fitz. In any case, we're slowly migrating things to C. -r
