Hi JP, Juan Pedro Bolivar Puente <[email protected]> writes:
> Hi David, > > My original implementation is based on the algorythm described here [1] > which is quite efficient, I see no special benefit in using hash tables. > I had planned to finish porting the code to the new filters API this > summer (I know I took the task long ago, I'm ashamed of delaying it so > much) so you can take other urgent tasks if you prefer. > > Thanks! > > [1] http://warp.povusers.org/EfficientLZW/ I see it, hash tables uses more memory. It is up to you. Ok, I delegate you to do it since I don't expend too long yet. You can take the task again. Thank you.
