It seems like the change in return value to a pdf_size_t was based on
an assumption that is no longer true:
> Yes, definitely. Since pdf_fsys_file_get_size operates in a
> pdf_fsys_file_t and not in a path we can expect that should not be no
> error in the execution of the function.
It is ok to me to get pdf_fsys_file_get_size to return a status value
again. But in that case please don't forget to update the
documentation in the gnupdf.texi file.
--
Jose E. Marchesi [email protected]
GNU Project http://www.gnu.org
