Jay,
 
I understand your feelings. It must be hard such experience. I already discussed here and other forums the security and copyrights matters. Then I understand too your choice. Go on with it in the next work because:
 
-- in the internet, information on security and copyrights comes from opinions and experiences, not from scientific methodology (for example, what is statistically better, to limit the circulation of your document and lost some sellings or the contrary?);
-- it is unknown the per centum of users that don't buy a product if they can not print, copy, save as, etc;
-- it is unknown the per centum of users that are inhibited by security barriers;
-- it is unknown the per centum of users that use a product they know comes from piracy;
-- it is unknown the per centum of users that don't buy a software  because are limitations to save it in other own device.
 
There are other unknown points, but these are sufficent to our purpose. The way to go seems to be a choice of each one. Then, go on and use all barriers you can in the next work.
 
Ruy Miranda  
>
>Please consider the fact that there are people like me, who suffered serious copyright infringement by university professors who posted my e-books as free downloads on their course pages....(accessible to anyone who searched for color). These ebooks are now in open circulation on the web...heck, Joe Bob gave it to me for free, I'll just attach it to email to Grandma. Or, I bought this CD, I'll just make a copy for Suzy.

This isn't just a pain the okole for me. I publish to make a living. In my case, the books contained the summation of 15 years of research and course content, the result of teaching at several Universities. Theses were serious, timeless (not trendy) books about color theory. And copyright infringement cost me far more than anyone can imagine, both mentally and financially. $80,000 plus in legal fees before I received a pittance of a settlement. Live and learn.

Even though my case may be unique, a confidential corporate document or a simple demographic study will spread like wildfire on the web, if the author does not take steps to prevent it. I value my output and my time. Maybe this is something that only those of us who are self-employed can understand.

I agree that it's a pain for customers and that serious hackers can prove their skills with cracking the encryption. But that doesn't solve the real issue for those who are serious writers producing e-books. Times are changing...even Microsoft software is node locking. Many others are following suit.

Whether it's FileOpen or another option, my next books will be encrypted with the most powerful tools available. Fair use (a copy as back-up) is one thing but unfortunately most people are copying CDs and Vids to give away to friends.  

Thou shalt not steal.

J

Colorcom
http://www.colorcom.com/






To change your subscription:
http://www.pdfzone.com/discussions/lists-pdf.html



IMPORTANT -

This email and any attachments are confidential and may be privileged in which case neither is intended to be waived. If you have received this message in error, please notify us and remove it from your system. It is your responsibility to check any attachments for viruses and defects before opening or sending them on. Where applicable, liability is limited by the Solicitors Scheme approved under the Professional Standards Act 1994 (NSW). Minter Ellison collects personal information to provide and market our services. For more information about use, disclosure and access, see our privacy policy at www.minterellison.com.


Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra.
Scan engine: VirusScan / Atualizado em 04/06/2003 / Vers�o: 1.3.13
Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://www.emailprotegido.terra.com.br/

Reply via email to