The PDF list is a service provided by PDFzone.com | http://www.pdfzone.com
__________________________________________________________________

Max sent this to me privately, but suggested I reply to the mailing list
regarding some of the general comments. So, to keep the discussion going,
here they are:

> >  - Forms may be filled out by legal professionals or your 
> average citizen.
> OK; this is more a contents-related issue...

It *should* be, but it won't. I don't think we're going to be making two
sets of forms, hence the reason I brought it up. 

> >  - We're open to condidering that end-users purchase 
> software (this would be
> >more likely to happen in the legal professional world).
>
> For "professional" use definitely acceptable; for "general public" 
> rather tricky; you better provide (sponsor) the tools etc.

Agreed. The point is if we find a great solution that simply requires an
end-user purchase, fine. We'll gear it towards the professional users and
the public will have to keep on using pen and paper. Far from perfect, but I
want to keep all options open at this point.

> >  - If there is a server based component, it'd be nice to 
> have the server
> >'remember' user data (ie, NAME, ADDRESS, forms-in-progress, etc.)
>
> If there is a server-component, will depend on the actual 
> workflows you have.

Ah. Workflow...now you're asking people here to think big-picture. That may
or may not happen ;o)

At the point, workflow is: Form created in word -> Committee approves -> I
distill to PDF and post on web.

What I'd like to see is: Form created -> Committee approves -> Form authored
(in whatever format appropriate) -> other interested parties comment -> form
published via CMS -> eFiled.

The reality is that workflow will more than likely match the current
situation for the forseeable future.

> Well, that is something you have to do anyway, in order to get your 
> forms. And actually, the most important step is not even the forms 
> creation per-se, but the analysis phase before you even think to 
> create a form.

For now, I'm concentrating on technical issues (I don't want to get into the
comittee based analysis situation...though I agree 100%).

The bottle neck is there, no matter what...correct. However, it would seem
to me that PDFs pale in comparison to a web-based forms WYSIWYG tool where
the author simply needs to fill out a form wizard to create their form.
Acrobat and the other PDF form authoring tool I used were clumsy and really
required more of a page-layout skillset. Lots of pop-ups and tabbed windows
to navigate through in a long, tedious process of naming each form element,
assigning values, formatting, etc. While I, personally, love the
fine-tunability of the tools, it's not terribly practical for assembly line
work.

> Wizard-style forms can be made PDF-based. The programming amount is 
> IMHO even smaller than for a ?ML-based system.

Interesting...can you tell me more?

> This is an approach, and will definitely work. However, again, it 
> will be the workflows which determine what you have to use.

Er...well, as much as I hate to say it, whatever technology we choose may
have as much bearing on the workflow as any other decision.

> The situation has changed with Adobe Reader 6, which can submit to 
> the server without the use of a browser.

Oh? Really?! That's great news! Good for Adobe. And good for users like me
that hate having to look at a PDF in a browser ;o)

And thanks for the product suggestions, Max. I'll quote them briefly here
for everyone's future reference:

> For forms creation, it is highly recommended to look at OneForm Plus 
> by Amgraf (http://www.amgraf.com)

> you might in addition consider a process 
> management system, such as the one provided by Movaris 
> (http://www.movaris.com).
> 
> You might also look at the solutions provided by Cardiff 
> (LiquidOffice), which contains a forms design tool and a process 
> management environment.
> 
> Depending on the off-line capabilities you need, you may also have to 
> look at the Adobe Document Server for Reader Extensions (which IMHO 
> would be necessary for reaching the general public)

-Darrel> 

To change your subscription:
http://www.pdfzone.com/discussions/lists-pdf.html

Reply via email to