On 15.08.2008 13:37:51 Kenneth D Weinert wrote:
> 
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > Thanks a lot, Ken! I've applied your patch with small
> > modifications. I skipped adding the two license files to the
> > website as I found the files in the "licenses" directory and
> > there's less redundancy if we just link to the SVN repository. I
> > hope you approve.
> No problem, it works for me.
> >
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=686163&view=rev
> >
> > You might have missed a detail in my replies: Would you please
> > attach your future patches to a new JIRA issue? JIRA is better
> > suited to explicitely state your intention of making a contribution
> > (see the "Attachment license" option when you attach stuff) and to
> > track the status of the patch.
> Sorry about that - I had the impression I needed to submit the ICLA
> first. I've signed up to JIRA now and will submit future patches
> through there.

The ICLA is only required for substantial contributions. My mentioning
it was a precautionary measure. I consider a few fixes in some
documentation to be covered under section 5 of the ALv2. It's something
else if you start writing new features for PDFBox.

> Just out of curiosity, was there something aside from the license
> files that I should have done differently?  After all, submitting
> patches isn't supposed to make more work for you :)

What you did was just fine. Processing patches is always work but you do
it for the project and in the hope of recruiting new future committers.
I know there are a lot of little things that a new contributor has to
learn when he's starting so there's nothing wrong if something takes
another round-trip or so. Anyway, I think we've had a good kick-off here.
Keep them patches coming! :-)

> Thanks.
>  
> 
> - --
> Ken Weinert
> http://quarter-flash.com



Jeremias Maerki

Reply via email to