I've added the test and fixed inv().  I don't think we need the
mod to PDL::Fit::Polynomial.  This does point out that PDL really
could use a clean, supported linear algebra framework rather
that the roll-our-own patchwork...

On 3/5/2015 11:38, Chris Marshall wrote:
A couple of points-

(1) please open a bug and add a test for the inv() failure

(2) modify PDL::Fit::Polynomial to use matinv() in preference to inv() *if available*

(3) I'll take a look at inv(), I remember it threading correctly. It definitely needs fixing. The problem may be a result of something changed elsewhere in perl/PDL.

Thanks,
Chris



On 3/4/2015 16:04, Karl Glazebrook wrote:
Hi Derek

Yes it seems the switch from PDL::Slatec::matinv to PDL::MatrixOps::inv was at fault! Clearly the latter does not thread correctly.

Further investigation suggests that for fitpoly1d($x,$y) with 2D $y then it fails when
- $x is absent
- $x is 2D
But it WORKS when $x is 1D, with $y 2D which is probably the most common case and why it was not caught to now! (That and me not writing a test)

Who made the change? Would anyone mind if we switched it back? The alternative is to make inv() thread correctly. I’d kind of like to correct this in 2.008. It’s my module :-)

Karl


On 4 Mar 2015, at 8:05 am, Derek Lamb <de...@boulder.swri.edu <mailto:de...@boulder.swri.edu>> wrote:

Hi Karl,

Maybe if we had a test for threaded fitpoly1d we would have caught this 4.5 years ago!

Looks like the problem is with the change from PDL::Slatec::matinv to PDL::MatrixOps::inv [8adb0b] <http://sourceforge.net/p/pdl/code/ci/8adb0b9e6e88ded9153563509794ed253d4f50e1/>. Running your example through the debugger I get:

DB<34> p inv($C)

[
 [ 0.168 -0.064]
 [ -0.32   0.16]
]

  DB<35> p matinv($C)

[
 [
  [ 0.6 -0.4]
  [-0.4  0.4]
 ]
 [
  [ 0.6 -0.4]
  [-0.4  0.4]
 ]
]

Wolfram Alpha suggests that matinv is correct. When running your single-dimension example through, inv and matinv return identical results.

My guess is PDL::MatrixOps::inv is not threadable. It certainly isn't advertised as such in the docs, though other subs in MatrixOps are advertised as such.

cheers,
Derek


On Mar 4, 2015, at 12:59 AM, Karl Glazebrook <karlglazebr...@mac.com <mailto:karlglazebr...@mac.com>> wrote:

fitpoly1d() no longer seems to thread over extra dimensions:

pdl> $x = pdl( [101,103,104,102,109] )

pdl> p $x
[101 103 104 102 109]
pdl> ($xf, $c) = fitpoly1d($x, 2)

pdl> p $xf
[100.8 102.3 103.8 105.3 106.8]
pdl>
pdl> $x = pdl( [101,103,104,102,109],[101,103,104,102,109] )

pdl> p $x

[
 [101 103 104 102 109]
 [101 103 104 102 109]
]

pdl> ($xf, $c) = fitpoly1d($x, 2)

pdl> p $xf  # WTF?!

[
 [    53.496   12.576    -28.344    -69.264 -110.184]
 [    53.496   12.576    -28.344    -69.264 -110.184]
]


I took a look at the Polynomial.pm and could no longer figure it out! I swear it used to work - anyone have any ideas?

Karl

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/_______________________________________________
pdl-devel mailing list
pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-devel




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
conversation now.http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/


_______________________________________________
pdl-devel mailing list
pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-devel


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
pdl-devel mailing list
pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-devel

Reply via email to