Hi Doug-
Have you been able to check out PDL::Graphics::PLplot with the new plplot?
It would be nice to have that to go with PDL-2.008. If time permits, I try
to
build plplot on my cygwin and then test the PDL::Graphics::PLplot. Anyone
else tried PDL::Graphics::PLplot?
--Chris
--Chris
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Doug Hunt <dh...@ucar.edu> wrote:
> Hi Ed, Chris: There have been changes to PDL::Graphics::PLplot from the
> version currently packaged with PDL. I'll download the latest PDL and the
> latest plplot, make sure it works and then merge in the changes.
>
> I have not used GIT much, what is the current procedure for doing this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Doug
>
>
> On 01/22/15 18:32, Chris Marshall wrote:
>
>>
>> On 1/22/2015 11:45, Ed wrote:
>>
>>> Two questions:
>>>
>>> 1) Doug, does PLplot need updating from the currently-included version
>>> with PDL 2.007_08? If so, please either do so on git master, or tell
>>> me where to get it and I'll include it in my next MR, along with a
>>> switch to default to "undef" so it tries to detect.
>>>
>>> 2) A wider question: given the convenience these days of using eg
>>> "cpanm Module::Name" which brings in all the dependencies of a module
>>> automatically, is there still a reason to bundle in all the
>>> non-fundamental PDL modules such as the Graphics ones, the IO ones...?
>>> I'm NOT proposing to change it for 2.008, but I have experimented here
>>> with breaking them up and it does make development much quicker since
>>> each build and test obviously takes less time. Another benefit would
>>> be to allow separate development on each component.
>>>
>>
>> See the mailing list archives for past discussion on this topic.
>>
>> The summary is that splitting off the non-core PDL modules would offer
>> exactly the benefits you suggest---faster updates, etc. Two issues
>> that need to be addressed (per the previous discussions):
>>
>> 1. A significant number of users want to keep the PDL kitchen sink
>> variant
>>
>> 2. The support for non-core PDL modules is not symmetric with core ones
>>
>> I think a PDL bundle could address the first. For the second we need
>> to see where the cracks/differences are and figure out what can be done
>> to fix.
>>
>> --Chris
>>
>> Ed
>>>
>>> -----Original Message----- From: Doug Hunt
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 3:58 PM
>>> To: pdl-port...@jach.hawaii.edu
>>> Subject: Re: [Pdl-porters] all I want for PDL-2.008 is my two...
>>>
>>> Hi Chris: The last I knew, PDL::Graphics::PLplot was working fine. I'm
>>> using an old version of PDL (2.4.11) for my production software, though.
>>>
>>> What is it that breaks, and how best to test it? I'd like to get this
>>> working, but I have not been keeping up with the latest PDL development.
>>> Is PDL on git now, or is it still officially in Source Forge SVN?
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>>
>>> Doug Hunt (author and (sometimes) maintainer of PDL::Graphics::PLplot)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 01/22/15 04:17, Chris Marshall wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes. The last status was that the PDL::Graphics::PLplot build did
>>>> not work.
>>>> If it can be checked out with the new PLplot then I would be happy to
>>>> change the setting.
>>>>
>>>> The latest release of PLplot allows me to build on cygwin but I haven't
>>>> had time to try it out myself. This would be a nice addition for
>>>> PDL-2.008.
>>>>
>>>> --Chris
>>>>
>>>> On 1/21/2015 16:54, kmx wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Chris,
>>>>>
>>>>> is there still a reason for having default:
>>>>>
>>>>> WITH_PLPLOT => 0 # which means disabled
>>>>>
>>>>> instead of
>>>>>
>>>>> WITH_PLPLOT => undef # which means try to detect
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> kmx
>>>>>
>>>>> On 18.1.2015 17:06, Chris Marshall wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> We're coming up on the end of January and the PDL-2.008 release. If
>>>>>> you have any essential features, fixes, improvements you would like
>>>>>> to see in PDL-2.008, now is the time to wrap them up. I'm working on
>>>>>> a few myself but I'm fine with getting an official PDL-2.008 out this
>>>>>> month. CPAN testers look good and there are some fixes and
>>>>>> improvements versus PDL-2.007 that are worth a broader venue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --Chris
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> PDL-porters mailing list
>>>>> pdl-port...@jach.hawaii.edu
>>>>> http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/pdl-porters
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PDL-porters mailing list
>>>> pdl-port...@jach.hawaii.edu
>>>> http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/pdl-porters
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PDL-porters mailing list
>>> pdl-port...@jach.hawaii.edu
>>> http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/pdl-porters
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PDL-porters mailing list
>>> pdl-port...@jach.hawaii.edu
>>> http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/pdl-porters
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
pdl-devel mailing list
pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-devel
