Hi Ed,
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 12:29:07AM +0000, Ed . wrote:
> Dear PDL Developers,
>
> It’s been nearly a year since the last release of PDL. Currently the
> PDL::Lite module does not do what is its entire point, which is to export a
> small set of functions that are supposed to work. The PR to fix this
> (https://github.com/PDLPorters/pdl/pull/260) has not been commented on, nor
> has it been merged and instantly dev- then proper-released.
>
> Do people still use PDL?
I do, for an important part of my daily work. So I hope for it to have
a long healthy life.
> Is it time for me to bring the “PDLA” code and idea up to date with
the current “real” PDL, and release it?
I would like to learn more about PDLA, its similarities and
differences to the current PDL, its implementation, its maturity, and
its compatibilities/incompatibilities for current code. I haven't
tried it yet, but I'll do asap.
> If I do, are we happy to start submitting patches etc to PDLA instead of PDL,
> and leave PDL in a static, known state?
--
o
W. Luis Mochán, | tel:(52)(777)329-1734 /<(*)
Instituto de Ciencias Físicas, UNAM | fax:(52)(777)317-5388 `>/ /\
Apdo. Postal 48-3, 62251 | (*)/\/ \
Cuernavaca, Morelos, México | moc...@fis.unam.mx /\_/\__/
GPG: 791EB9EB, C949 3F81 6D9B 1191 9A16 C2DF 5F0A C52B 791E B9EB
_______________________________________________
pdl-devel mailing list
pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-devel
