Now I have run the C benchmark and Ed's. My results are:

   | Program      | # iterations | time (s) | speed (K/s) | factor |
   |--------------+--------------+----------+-------------+--------|
   | ansi c       |        150e6 |      133 |   1127.8195 |     1. |
   | perl         |        1.5e6 |       56 |   26.785714 |   42.1 |
   | my pdl       |         15e6 |       67 |   223.88060 |    5.0 |
   | Ed's pdl     |         15e6 |       16 |       937.5 |    1.2 |
   | Ed's 4 cores |         15e6 |       11 |   1363.6364 |    0.8 |

So, as Ed wrote, just by stting and environment variable,
perl+pdl+pp_def can be made faster than c.




On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 07:03:50PM -0500, Luis Mochan wrote:
> I made my own version of the ray-tracing program (as I tried to
> understand it). I didn't use pp_def, only Perl and ordinary PDL. I used
> ...

--

                                                                  o
W. Luis Mochán,                      | tel:(52)(777)329-1734     /<(*)
Instituto de Ciencias Físicas, UNAM  | fax:(52)(777)317-5388     `>/   /\
Av. Universidad s/n CP 62210         |                           (*)/\/  \
Cuernavaca, Morelos, México          | moc...@fis.unam.mx   /\_/\__/
GPG: 791EB9EB, C949 3F81 6D9B 1191 9A16  C2DF 5F0A C52B 791E B9EB


_______________________________________________
pdl-devel mailing list
pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-devel

Reply via email to