On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 12:06 AM Ed . <ej...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Wait, PDL has *users*? Glad you figured it! Another option would be just > to depend on the version of PDL that introduced that (2.064). In pure-C > land, I’d suggest having your code use “trans_parent”, and #if > PDL_CORE_VERSION < 19 then #define that to “trans” (since there are likely > to be fewer false positives that way round). >
Yup, that's exactly what I did. This way the existing codebase is closer to the newer PDL codebase than the older. > Another name-change that just got pushed to the repo: “threading” (the > confusing, ambiguous name) has just been changed to the now-standard > “broadcasting”. I could feel confusion that I didn’t realise I was > experiencing lift as I went through the updating. > Thank you! This bothered me but I never had the tuits to do anything about it. > Best regards, > > Ed > David
_______________________________________________ pdl-devel mailing list pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-devel
