Thanks for the feedback!

I have to take a look at these modules, I know, good remainder, and good to
know they exist. For sure my modules, from 2005-2007, should be adaptated
since tons of things have changed in PDL, you have taken the lead.  Or
eventually just list of functions could be used as hint.
__
Greg

PS: SSD yes.

Le ven. 15 avr. 2022 à 20:33, Ed . <ej...@hotmail.com> a écrit :

> Hi Greg,
>
>
>
> Elementary, my dear Watson!
>
>
>
> I don’t know what you mean by “with another commit” – it doesn’t have to
> be me that does these things, pull requests are just great.
>
>
>
> It’s a pity your drive isn’t working (I assume you mean SSD, solid-state
> disk), since that code sounds really good – any code that matters is best
> kept in a GitHub repo, limiting how much a hardware failure can destroy. We
> have a Data::Frame module that got updated recently, and the stats stuff
> may exist in PDL::Stats, but it would be good to compare with what you have!
>
>
>
> And thank you for your contributions, then and now!
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Ed
>
>
>
> *From: *Grégory Vanuxem <g.vanu...@gmail.com>
> *Sent: *15 April 2022 19:25
> *To: *Ed . <ej...@hotmail.com>; pdl-devel
> <pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
> *Subject: *Re: [Pdl-devel] PDL::LinearAlgebra::Special synopsis
>
>
>
> Oh thanks.
>
>
>
> What an investigation !
>
> You could be a good detective I think 😉
>
>
>
> And about a pull request I will do it. I though you would want to add this
> modification with another commit.
>
>
>
> And yes it’s me so. I guess I wanted to add different Matrix types,
> presumably based on the PDL Matrix class, trangular, diagonal etc. Idea
> abandoned but if I remember correctly I preferred to use the nd-array
> concept for the use of statistical analysis of arrays, Data Fame for
> example.
>
>
>
> I have on an old SDD, an advanced statistical module with usual operations
> (mean, var etc.), Data Frame which were printed with each row and column
> denomination (a new class), hypothesis testing stuff, ANOVA and the like,
> interface to all operations on distributions (normal, binomial, etc.) from
> R and nmath C libraries (included in the module), Principal Component
> Analysis, several factorial analysis (different rotation matrices) and the
> like. It’s a pity I can not read this SDD for now. I don’t even know if
> it’s still readable and only buying an USB  interface from China would be
> possible I think. No professional where I live as far as I know has this
> material. And last time my order from Amazon Market was cancelled three
> weeks later. Maybe one day.
>
>
>
> In any case, thank you,
>
> Keep up the good work!
>
> __
>
> Greg
>
>
>
> Le ven. 15 avr. 2022 à 14:38, Ed . <ej...@hotmail.com> a écrit :
>
> Hi Greg,
>
>
>
>
> https://metacpan.org/release/ELLIPSE/PDL-LinearAlgebra-0.01/view/Special/Special.pm
> (the first CPAN version of PDL::LinearAlgebra) has the same bit, and it’s
> released by one “Grégory Vanuxem”. The “someone” wouldn’t happen to be you
> back in 2005? ;-)
>
>
>
> It’s easiest for me (as the humble PDL maintainer) if this sort of thing
> is submitted as a pull request that I can just merge with one click. GitHub
> allows one to “edit” a file (the pencil icon top right of
> https://github.com/PDLPorters/pdl-linearalgebra/blob/master/lib/PDL/LinearAlgebra/Special.pm)
> which will automatically fork the repo if you’re not already a collaborator
> on it, and lets you then pull-request that with a couple of clicks just in
> the web UI. You don’t even need to clone the repo locally!
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Ed
>
>
>
> *From: *Grégory Vanuxem <g.vanu...@gmail.com>
> *Sent: *15 April 2022 04:36
> *To: *pdl-devel <pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
> *Subject: *[Pdl-devel] PDL::LinearAlgebra::Special synopsis
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> The synopsis of this module seems wrong to me.
>
> use PDL::LinearAlgebra::Mtype
>
> Should read:
>
> 'use PDL::LinearAlgebra::Special' instead.
>
> I have not found the commit so I don't know how to comment on the file
> at GitHub. Apparently someone began to implement a Matrix type but I
> may be wrong here. No pull request as it's too simple.
>
> Regards,
> __
> Greg
>
> _______________________________________________
> pdl-devel mailing list
> pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-devel
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
pdl-devel mailing list
pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-devel

Reply via email to